Back To Previous
Page Forest Basics | Boreal Forests | Rain Forests | Temperate Forests Logging | Forest Economy | Tree Facts |
Forests
Rain Forest
WHERE ARE THE
RAINFORESTS
The map below shows the location of
the world's tropical rainforests. Rainforests cover only a small
part of the earth's surface - about 6%, yet they are home to over
half the species of plants and animals in the world.

CENTRAL
AMERICA: This
region was once entirely covered with rainforest, but large areas
have been cleared for cattle ranching and for sugar cane
plantations. Like other major rainforests, the jungles and mangrove
swamps of Central America contain many plants and animals found
nowhere else. Central America is famous for its large number of
tropical birds, including many kinds of parrots.
THE
AMAZON: The
Amazon jungle is the world's largest tropical rainforest. The forest
covers the basin of the Amazon, the world's second longest river.The
Amazon is home to the greatest variety of plants and animals on
Earth. A 1/5 of all the world's plants and birds and about 1/10 of
all mammal species are found there.
AFRICA: Central
Africa holds the world's second largest rainforest. To the south
east, the large island of Madagascar was once intensively forested,
but now much of it is gone. Africa contains areas of high cloud
forest, mangrove swamps and flooded forests. The island of
Madagascar is home to many unique plants and animals not found
anywhere else.
SOUTHERN
ASIA: The
rainforests of Asia stretch from India and Burma in the west to
Malaysia and the islands of Java and Borneo in the east. Bangladesh
has the largest area of mangrove forests in the world. In Southeast
Asia the climate is hot and humid all year round. In the mainland
Asia it has a subtropical climate with torrential monsoon rains
followed by a drier period.
AUSTRALASIA: Millions
of years ago, Australia, New Zealand and the island of New Guinea
formed part of a great forested southern continent, isolated from
the rest of the world. Today these countries contain many different
species of animal that occur nowhere else.Undergrowth in Australia's
tropical forests is dense and lush. The forests lie in the path of
wet winds blowing in from the Pacific.
HOW THE RAINFOREST
WORKS
Tropical rainforests are
the most diverse ecosystem on Earth, and also the oldest. Today,
tropical rainforests cover only 6 percent of the Earth's ground
surface, but they are home to over half of the planet's plant and
animal species. In this completely unique world, there are thousands
of species we have yet to discover.
Generally speaking, a
rainforest is an environment that receives high rainfall and is
dominated by tall trees. A wide range of ecosystems fall into this
category, of course, including the old-growth temperate forests of
the Pacific Northwest. But most of the time when people talk about
rainforests, they mean the tropical rainforests located near the
equator.
These forests, concentrated
in Africa, Australia, Asia, and Central and South America, receive
between 160 and 400 inches (406.4 to 1016 cm) of rain per year.
Unlike the rainforests farther to the north and south, tropical
rainforests don't really have a "dry season." In fact, they don't
have distinct seasons at all. The total annual rainfall is spread
pretty evenly throughout the year, and the temperature rarely dips
below 60 degrees Fahrenheit (16 degrees Celsius).
This steady climate is due
to the position of rainforests on the globe. Because of the
orientation of the Earth's axis, the Northern and Southern
hemispheres each spend part of the year tilted away from the sun.
Since rainforests are at the middle of the globe, located near the
equator, they are not especially affected by this change. They
receive nearly the same amount of sunlight, and therefore heat, all
year. Consequently, the weather in these regions remains fairly
constant.
The consistently wet, warm
weather and ample sunlight give plant life everything it needs to
thrive. Trees have the resources to grow to tremendous heights, and
they live for hundreds, even thousands, of years. These giants,
which reach 60 to 150 ft (18 to 46 m) in the air, form the basic
structure of the rainforest. Their top branches spread wide in order
to capture maximum sunlight. This creates a thick canopy level at
the top of the forest, with thinner greenery levels underneath. Some
large trees, called emergents, grow so tall (up to 250 ft / 76 m)
that they even tower over the canopy layer.
As you go lower, down into
the rainforest, you find less and less greenery. The forest floor is
made up of moss, fungi, and decaying plant matter that has fallen
from the upper layers. The reason for this decrease in greenery is
very simple: The overabundance of plants gathering sunlight at the
top of the forest blocks most sunlight from reaching the bottom of
the forest. The lowest levels of the rainforest are extremely dark,
making it difficult for robust plants to thrive. As little as 1
percent of the light shining onto the forest reaches the lowest
levels.
This makes for a
fascinating biological community in which plant life is striving to
reach 100 ft (30.5 m) into the air, and most food for animals comes
from above.
There are over 3,000 fruits
found in rainforests. People in the Western World make use of about
200 of them, but the indigenous tribes of the rainforest make use of
over 2,000. Roughly 80 percent of the food we eat originally came
from tropical rainforests. Without rainforests, we wouldn't have the
seeds that produce coffee and chocolate. Other rainforest foods
include tomatoes, potatoes, rice, bananas, black pepper, pineapples
and corn. Rainforest tribes also have a knowledge of rainforest
medicine that far exceeds the Western World's. One major problem
with deforestation is the devastating effect it has on these tribes.
As these cultures are lost, so is their extensive knowledge of the
vast resources of the rainforest, whose wild plants are vital to our
well being. The ample sunlight and extremely wet climate of many
tropical areas encourages the growth of towering trees with wide
canopies. This thick top layer of the rainforest dictates the lives
of all other plants in the forest. New tree seedlings rarely survive
to make it to the top unless some older trees die, creating a "hole"
in the canopy. When this happens, all of the seedlings on the ground
level compete intensely to reach the sunlight. Most other plants
survive by taking advantage of the trees that form the canopy
layer.
Many plant species reach
the top of the forest by climbing the tall trees. It is much easier
to ascend this way, because the plant doesn't have to form its own
supporting structure. Lianas, long, woody plants that can grow more
than 8 inches (20 cm) across, will often climb tall trees all the
way up to the canopy layer. At the top of the forest, these climbers
may spread from tree to tree, making the canopy ceiling even
thicker. Some plant species, called epiphytes, grow directly on the
surface of the giant trees. These plants, which include a variety of
orchids and ferns, make up much of the understory, the layer of the
rainforest right below the canopy. Epiphytes are close enough to the
top to receive adequate light, and the runoff from the canopy layer
provides all the water and nutrients they need, which is important
since they don't have access to the nutrients in the ground. Some
epiphytes eventually develop into stranglers. They grow long, thick
roots that extend down the tree trunk into the ground. As they
continue to grow, the roots form a sort of web structure all around
the tree. At the same time, the strangler plant's branches extend
upward, spreading out into the canopy. Eventually, the strangler may
block so much light from above, and absorb such a high percentage of
nutrients from the ground below, that the host tree dies. When the
host decomposes, the strangler's lattice of roots remains, giving
the plant the structure it needs to reach from the forest floor to
the canopy.
Competition over nutrients
is almost as intense as competition for light. The excessive
rainfall rapidly dissolves nutrients in the soil, making it
relatively infertile except at the top layers. For this reason,
rainforest tree roots grow outward to cover a wider area, rather
than downward to lower levels. This makes rainforest trees somewhat
unstable, since they don't have very strong anchors in the ground.
Some trees compensate for this by growing natural buttresses. These
buttresses are basically tree trunks that extend out from the side
of the tree and down to the ground, giving the tree additional
support.
Rainforest trees are
dependent on bacteria that are continually producing nutrients in
the ground. Rainforest bacteria and trees have a very close,
symbiotic relationship. The trees provide the bacteria with food, in
the form of fallen leaves and other material, and the bacteria break
this material down into the nutrients that the trees need to
survive. Even with this amazing symbiotic cycle, nutrients are
scarce. Some plant species gather additional nutrients by capturing
bugs or catching plant material that falls from the canopy above.
One of the most remarkable
things about rainforest plant life is its diversity. The temperate
rainforests of the Pacific Northwest are mainly composed of a dozen
or so tree species. A tropical rainforest, on the other hand, might
have 300 distinct tree species. This plant life is spread out over
wide areas -- in a square acre, an entire species might be
represented by only a few individual plants. Rainforests are home to
the majority of animal species in the world. And a great number of
species who now live in other environments, including humans,
originally inhabited the rainforests. Researchers estimate that in a
large rainforest area, there may be more than 10-million different
animal species. Most of these species have adapted for life in the
upper levels of the rainforest, where food is most plentiful.
Insects, which can easily climb or fly from tree to tree, make up
the largest group (ants are the most abundant animal in the
rainforest). Insect species have a highly symbiotic relationship
with the plant life in a rainforest. The insects move from plant to
plant, enjoying the wealth of food provided there. As they travel,
the insects may pick up the plants' seeds, dropping them some
distance away. This helps to disperse the population of the plant
species over a larger area -- underneath the canopy, the wind is not
strong enough to carry seeds a significant distance, so plants
depend entirely on animals for seed dispersal. Less-harmful insects
may also help a plant by fighting off more destructive insect
species. The numerous birds of the rainforest also play a major part
in seed dispersal. When they eat fruit from a plant, the seeds pass
through their digestive system. By the time they excrete the seeds,
the birds may have flown many miles away from the fruit-bearing
tree.
Most people are familiar
with the colorful parrots of the tropical rainforests, but this is
only one part of the total bird population. Rainforest bird species
come in all shapes and sizes, from tiny hummingbirds to large
toucans. Over one-fourth of all bird species in the world today live
in tropical rainforests. There are also a large number of reptiles
and mammals in the rainforest. Many of these species have remarkable
adaptations for life in the trees. Some animals have very thin webs
of skin that let them glide from branch to branch. Many mammals,
including a wide variety of monkeys, have developed prehensile
tails. Essentially, the tail works like an extra hand to grasp hold
of tree branches. Obviously, this adaptation makes life much easier
for animals who spend their lives in the trees. For example, a
monkey might grab onto a branch with its tail so it can reach down
to grab a piece of fruit that would otherwise be inaccessible.
Since the weather is so hot
and humid during the day, most rainforest mammals are active only at
night, dusk or dawn. The many rainforest bat species are especially
well adapted for this lifestyle. Using their sonar, bats navigate
easily through the mass of trees in the rainforest, feeding on
insects and fruit. While most rainforest species spend their lives
in the trees, there is also a lot of life on the forest floor. Great
apes, such as gorillas and orangutans, wild pigs, big cats and even
elephants can all be found in rainforests. There are a number of
people who live in the rainforests, as well. These indigenous tribes
-- which, up until recently, numbered in the thousands -- are being
forced out of the rainforests at an alarming rate because of
deforestation.
DEFORESTATION
In the past hundred
years, humans have begun destroying rainforests at an alarming rate.
Today, roughly 1.5 acres of rainforest are destroyed every second.
People are cutting down the rainforests in pursuit of three major
resources:
* Land for crops * Lumber for
paper and other wood products * Land for livestock
pastures
In the past, scientists often referred
to tropical rainforests as the "lungs of the world" because of the
large amount of oxygen they produce. More recent evidence shows that
rainforests don't have much of an effect on the world's oxygen
supply. The decomposition of dead plant matter consumes roughly the
same amount of oxygen that the living plants produce. But
rainforests do play a key role in the global ecosystem. Some experts
are now calling them the "air conditioners to the world," because
their dark depths absorb heat from the sun. Without the forest
cover, these regions would reflect more heat into the atmosphere,
warming the rest of the world. Losing the rainforests may also have
a profound effect on global wind and rainfall patterns, potentially
causing droughts throughout the United States and other
areas.
The act of deforestation
itself affects the environment as a whole. Roughly 30 percent of the
carbon dioxide released in the air (a leading cause of global
warming) comes from burning the rainforests. In the current economy,
people obviously have a need for all of these resources. But almost
all experts agree that, over time, we will suffer much more from the
destruction of the rainforests than we will benefit. There are
several factors involved in this scientific assessment:
* To begin with, the land in
rainforest regions is not particularly suited for crops and
livestock. Once the forest is cleared, it is even less so --
without any decomposing plant life, the soil is so infertile
that it is nearly useless for growing anything. Generally,
when people clear-cut a forest, they can only use the land for
a year or two before the nutrients from the original plants
are depleted, leaving a huge, barren tract of land.
* Cutting large sections of
rainforest may be a good source of lumber right now, but in
the long run it actually diminishes the world's lumber supply.
Experts say that we should preserve most of the rainforests
and harvest them only on a small scale. This way, we maintain
a self-replenishing supply of lumber for the
future.
* Rainforests are
often called the world's pharmacy, because their diverse plant
and animal populations make up a vast collection of potential
medicines (not to mention food sources). More than 25 percent
of the medicines we use today come from plants originating in
rainforests, and these plants make up only a tiny fraction of
the total collection of rainforest
species.
Fewer than 1 percent of
rainforest plants have been examined for their medicinal properties.
It is extremely likely that our best shot at curing cancer, AIDS and
many other debilitating diseases lies somewhere in the world's
diminishing rainforests. With some 137 rainforest species
disappearing every day (the most rapid extinction rate in the
history of the world), there's a good chance that we're losing
valuable medicines by the minute.
There are approximately
2,000 million hectares of tropical forests in the world. They
represent an enormously valuable resource in terms of the diverse
economic products and environmental services they provide. At the
present time, 14 to 16 million hectares of tropical forests are
being converted each year to other land uses, mostly agricultural.
The principal agents of deforestation -- those individuals who are
cutting down the forests -- include slash-and-burn farmers,
commercial farmers, ranchers, loggers, firewood collectors,
infrastructure developers and others. The predisposing conditions
that favour deforestation include poverty, greed, quest for power,
population growth, and illiteracy. The indirect causes of
deforestation include inappropriate government policies, land
hunger, national and global market forces, the undervaluation of
natural forests, weak government institutions, and social factors.
The more visible direct causes of deforestation include the land
uses that compete with the natural forests (e.g. agriculture,
ranching, infrastructure development, and mining and petroleum
exploration). Logging, fuelwood collection, and tree plantations
also have a role in the deforestation phenomena. The economic and
environmental consequences of deforestation are profound, making it
one of the most critical issues facing our global society. While it
is impossible to stop deforestation in the foreseeable future, there
are many opportunities for bringing it under control and minimizing
its negative impacts. Alternatives include the protection and
management of remaining forests, socioeconomic development in rural
areas, and policy and institutional reforms.
The world's rainforest are
an extremely valuable natural resource, to be sure, but not for
their lumber or their land. They are the main cradle of life on
Earth, and they hold millions of unique life forms that we have yet
to discover. Destroying the rainforests is comparable to destroying
an unknown planet -- we have no idea what we're losing. If
deforestation continues at its current rate, the world's tropical
rainforests will be wiped out within 40 years.
DEFORESTATION - PAST AND
PRESENT
Historical
Deforestation

Eight thousand years ago at
the advent of sedentary agriculture, forests covered approximately
40 per cent of the world's land area or about 6,000 million
hectares. For the next 7,500 years, farm and pasture lands gradually
crept into the forests, covering the most fertile, most accessible
soils. The areas most greatly affected were the Middle East, the
Mediterranean watershed, South Asia, and the Far East. Forest
removal in Mesopotamia and the Mediterranean Basin was well advanced
in pre-Christian times. Those forests that do remain are in many
cases badly degraded. For example, in Turkey, the forests of Pinus
brutia have been selectively harvested for only the tallest, the
straightest trees for centuries. The present trees are now reported
to be genetically inferior in form and stature, a consequence of
harvesting only the best trees. In centuries past, countries like
China and India had considerably more forest cover than they do
today. Their forests were decimated to supply their growing
populations with wood for building materials, to provide firewood to
cook their food and heat their houses, and to open up new lands to
grow crops on.
After the first European
contact with the New World over 500 years ago, the forests of the
Western Hemisphere also began to disappear. The more accessible
forests of coastal Brazil and those of the Caribbean were converted
into sugar plantations. In North America, settlers arrived from
Europe and slaves were brought in from Africa to convert what was
once a vast expanse of temperate forest into farms and ranches.
Forests were cleared to accommodate the settlers' growing needs for
new land on which to grow their food crops. Favourable temperate
soils made sustainable agriculture possible and a viable alternative
to forestry as the best use of the land. Forests were also cleared
for firewood for cooking and heating, and for construction wood for
houses and furniture. Meanwhile, back in Europe, the arrival of the
Industrial Revolution put tremendous pressure on the remaining
forests to supply fuel for the smelters and foundries of the new
industries. Before the end of the 19th century, most of the Europe's
ancient forests were only distant memories. Between 1850 and 1980,
15 per cent of the world's forests and woodlands were cleared. The
world forest area has now shrunk to 3,500 million hectares as a
consequence of human exploitation, most of which occurred in the
latter half of the 20th century.
Contemporary
Deforestation

Although the world's forest
area has been declining for centuries, it is in the last half of the
20th century that the process has accelerated to alarming
proportions. Since the 1960s there has been a major change in the
rate at which tropical forests are being cleared. In contrast, the
area of temperate forests in developed countries grew by 0.1 per
cent in the 1980s. For example, Canada witnessed a net increase in
its area of forest land from 416.2 million hectares in the late
1980s to 417.6 million hectares in 1997 -- an increase of 1.4
million hectares.
How much forest is being
lost to deforestation? The Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations (FAO 1997) has estimated the annual rates of
deforestation in developing countries at 15.5 million hectares for
the period 1980-1990 and 13.7 million hectares for 1990-1995. The
total forest area lost during the 15 year period was approximately
200 million hectares. To put this figure in perspective, 200 million
hectares is more than the total land area of Mexico or
Indonesia.
FAO reports that the change
in forest cover between 1980 and 1990 in Africa is largely the
result of the forests being cleared for small farmer agriculture and
permanent agriculture/pastures, with slow, progressive degradation
occurring from firewood collection. Rural population pressures were
attributed to be the main driving force behind these changes. In
contrast, Latin America has seen a shift towards permanent
agriculture and cattle ranching, often in association with
settlement and infrastructure projects. In Asia, the situation is
more complex with large resettlement schemes, intensive timber
harvesting, the expansion of commercial agriculture, and the
continued spread of shifting cultivation into the remaining forests.
Converting forests to plantations, both forest plantations and
agriculture plantations (e.g. rubber, oil palm,) was carried out on
a large scale in Asia. The tragedy lies in the fact that most of
these deforested lands are not suited for long-term farming or
grazing and they quickly degrade once the forest has been cut and
burnt. In fact, throughout the tropics, very few of the forested
lands that are left have any potential for sustainable
agriculture.
Desertification,
particularly in Africa and Asia, has also contributed to
deforestation through land degradation in drier climates. It affects
about 3,000 to 3,500 million hectares, about one-quarter of the
world's land area as a consequence of unsustainable
over-cultivation, over-grazing, over-cutting of trees and shrubs,
and poor water management on irrigated lands.
Most of the deforestation
is concentrated in relatively few countries. The "top 10"
deforesting countries account for 7.4 million hectares or about 50
per cent of all of the annual forest lost, suggesting that if
fundamental changes in land use can be made in those countries it
will have a major impact on reducing forest loss.
"Top 10"
Deforesting Countries in Terms of Total Forest Loss
(1995) (area loss in hectares)
|
Country |
ranking |
annual loss |
|
country |
ranking |
annual loss |
|
Brazil |
1 |
-2,550,000 |
|
Venezuela |
6 |
-500.000 |
|
Indonesia |
2 |
-1,080,000 |
|
Malaysia |
7 |
-400,000 |
|
P.R. Congo |
3 |
-740,000 |
|
Myanmar |
8 |
-390,000 |
|
Bolivia |
4 |
-580,000 |
|
Sudan |
9 |
-350,000 |
|
Mexico |
5 |
-510,000 |
|
Thailand |
10 |
-330,000 |
(FAO, 1997)
Brazil is the country with
the largest area of tropical forests and, at the same time, suffers
from the greatest deforestation. Until the late 1970s, deforestation
in Brazil was considered a minor problem with a limited local
impact. However, the situation changed dramatically. During the next
20 years, 50 million hectares of forest were cleared in the states
of Rondônia, Pará, Amazonas, Mato Grosso, and Acre, accounting for
nearly 14 per cent of the Brazilian Amazon. This was deforestation
at an unprecedented scale. Many factors contributed to Brazil's
runaway deforestation. The most notorious agents of deforestation
were the ranchers who took advantage of existing government
subsidies that encouraged expansion of the cattle industry.
Incentives and improved access from new highway construction fueled
a land speculation frenzy. Ranchers were joined by tens of thousands
of small farmers from southern Brazil who were looking for new
farming land after having had been displaced by commercial farming
estates. On another front, thousands of hectares of forest were
cleared to feed the charcoal burners supplying the
government-controlled Carajás mine in the State of Pará before
eucalyptus plantations were established to supply the mine's energy
needs. More recently, pressure has been placed on the "cerrado"
woodlands of northern Brazil by commercial farmers who are clearing
the land to plant soybeans. Gold mining, flooding from hydroelectric
dams, and commercial logging were other important
factors.
In addition to the "Top 10"
countries, there are other countries that have experienced very high
annual rates of deforestation. The total area of forests being lost
each year might not be that great but the impact on remaining
forests, their biodiversity, and their continued ability to perform
their environmental functions and provide their economic goods is
being seriously threatened.
Important
Deforesting Countries and Regions in Terms of Annual Rate of Loss
(1995)
|
Country |
Ranking |
%
Annual Loss |
|
Country |
Ranking |
%
Annual Loss |
|
Philippines |
1 |
-3.5 |
|
Central America |
6 |
-2.1 |
|
Sierra Leone |
2 |
-3.0 |
|
Caribbean Islands |
7 |
-1.7 |
|
Pakistan |
3 |
-2.9 |
|
Cambodia |
8 |
-1.6 |
|
Thailand |
4 |
-2.6 |
|
Ecuador |
9 |
-1.6 |
|
Paraguay |
5 |
-2.6 |
|
Myanmar |
10 |
-1.6 |
(FAO, 1997)
Some countries have
witnessed the virtual disappearance of their forests in the last
half century. In The Last Frontier Forests, the World Resources
Institute describes the extent and location of the remaining
undisturbed, biologically-intact tracts of forests. Thirty
developing countries are identified as having lost all of their
frontier forests. This is not to say that these countries do not
have any forests, however the ones that have survived, have been
impacted upon so severely that they have lost the capacity to
provide the environmental functions (e.g. conservation of
biodiversity, hydrologic cycles, moderation of climate) that they
once did. Most of this decline has come as a consequence of
deforestation. If current trends continue, other countries will join
the ranks of nations that have allowed their forests to degrade and
disappear.
Developing
Countries With No Remaining Large Tracts of
Undisturbed, Biologically-Intact Forests
.
|
|
Latin America & Caribbean |
Asia |
| Angola |
Guinea |
Senegal |
El
Salvador |
Pakistan |
| Benin |
Guinea-Bissau |
Sierra
Leone |
Haiti |
Philippines |
| Botswana |
Kenya |
South
Africa |
Paraguay |
|
| Equatorial
Guinea |
Madagascar |
Togo |
|
| Eritrea |
Mozambique |
Uganda |
| Ethiopia |
Namibia |
Zambia |
| The
Gambia |
Rwanda |
Zimbabwe |
| Ghana |
Sao Tome &
Pincipe |
|
| |
|
|
In 1997 and 1998, there
were serious losses in forest cover from the forest fires in
Southeast Asia, particularly in the Sumatra and Kalimantan regions
of Indonesia. The widespread fires were related to new commercial
agricultural projects, land clearing for tree and agricultural
plantations, dry residues left in the forest after logging, and
slash-and-burn agriculture. The situation was complicated by the
very dry climatic conditions caused by the El Niño phenomenon.
Despite the concerns of the Ministry of Forests and the advice of
numerous missions from international development agencies, the fires
could not be contained. The area of forest lost to the fires has not
been accurately documented; estimates vary from 170,000 hectares to
over 2 million hectares. A devastating fire in 1982 destroyed over 3
million hectares, according to estimates. These fires were
associated with clearing brush fallow and forest to establish
plantations of oil palm, pulpwood, and rice. In 1998, Mexico and
Central America also suffered serious forest fires after an
unusually long dry season. The fires were associated with land
clearing for new cattle pastures and for slash-and-burn
agriculture.
Despite the apparent
precision of the quoted figures for the rates of deforestation, the
exact area of forest lost each year is not known. The accuracy of
estimates is hampered by the lack of reliable time-sequence land use
maps, varying standards for forest and non-forest classification,
inadequate ground truthing of satellite imagery, and the
institutional weakness of government forest departments around the
world. Mexico is a good example of the monitoring and reporting
problem. According to FAO (FAO 1997), Mexican deforestation in the
period 1990-1995 averaged 510,000 hectares annually. However, for
the 1980s it is difficult to find a reliable estimate. In a recent
government planning document, 13 different estimates are quoted for
the annual deforestation rate ranging from 370,000 to 1,500,000
hectares annually with most estimates about 670,000 hectares per
annum (Anon, 1995). Most forest loss occurred in southern Mexico in
the states of Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Campeche, and Yucatan, as a
consequence of the expansion of farming and ranching combined with
illegal timber cutting and forest fires.
The monitoring of
deforestation has improved in recent years, but it is still far from
acceptable. Deforestation estimates are probably conservative and
underestimate the rate of forest cover loss. FAO, the UN body
responsible for collecting and publishing the statistics, is largely
dependent on the information provided to it by the forest
departments of each reporting country. The information is often
inaccurate, based on old forest inventory and land use data, and at
times tempered by political and national security considerations.
Unfortunately, considerable caution must be used when drawing
conclusions about the extent of deforestation at the national and
regional levels from the data currently available.
|